About Compassionate Connecting

"Compassionate Connecting" describes our intention to facilitate communication and contribute to deepening relationships between people, within groups and organizations through the practice of Nonviolent Communication (NVC) GiraffeSurfer@gmail.com

What is Nonviolent Communication (NVC)?
NVC is a form of language based on work by Marshall Rosenberg that is sometimes called compassionate communication. Its purpose is to strengthen our ability to inspire compassion from others and to respond compassionately to others and to ourselves. NVC guides us to reframe how we express ourselves and hear others by focusing on what we are observing, feeling, needing and requesting.



Surfing Metaphor

I like to use waves as a symbol for needs, and "Compassionate Connecting" is the surfboard. The challenge then becomes how to catch the wave so that we can all surf -- to connect and stay connected to others even as we identify our conflicting strategies. Once we each truly hear each others needs, finding mutually satisfying strategies is much more likely than before.

Monday, January 28, 2008

Challenge of Believing vs. Living it

Yesterday, I met with other giraffes (just a playful name for someone who practices NVC), and in our group interaction, we ran into the challenge of 'believing in a way of life' vs. 'living it' (i.e. when the words do not match the actions or life of the people involved). In this context, my experience is that our group had a little of both aspects present in the group, so we were able to talk about them after one of our participants voiced her concern (i.e. honesty) that her needs for connection were not being met, and she was feeling sad and disappointed.

What happened was a few of us (yes, I was one of them) got excited about some historical cases in which the words expressed or written were confused with the original meaning intended, resulting in lots of violence. As a sample of the dialog, I had just reminded the group of Marshall's quote of "don't confuse the map with the territory." So, in short, the emphasis of that part of the dialog was on thinking and analyzing the intricacies of NVC, and the interactions between people were mostly intellectual. And this was not meeting the needs of one of the participants, and she spoke up (i.e. using NVC by giving her honesty in a way in which she made an observation without judgment, stated her feelings and needs, and made a request of the group). The group responded with empathy, where we listened and echoed back to her what we were hearing in her heart (i.e. her feelings and needs), and then we came up with some strategies in which all of our needs could get met.

So, by her speaking her honesty to the group, she contributed to all of us getting our focus back on living the practice of communicating from the heart through NVC. And we were all happy that she did, and there's a chance that this group of people will meet again. She shared afterwards how scary it was for her to express her honesty, as she was wanting safety and acceptance. I must admit that there are times when giving honesty is also scary for me; I am sure that this topic will come up again.

In making this blog entry, I am excited because this meets my needs for authenticity, contribution and meaning. I have run into this sort of challenge of belief vs. living the belief in other circles. I am curious if anyone else has run into this challenge, and I would also like to know if anything I said stimulated anything in you (if so, please 'comment')?

2 comments:

Tam said...

oooh, remember marshall's session on 'scary honesty' and how he said we need to learn to enjoy seeing the recipient freaking out! hee hee. i am having problems with scary honesty all the time. i am in SO many situations where certain people are doing things which do not meet my needs (amongst which also hyper intellectualised conversations that frankly, bore me) and i don't dare say a thing for fear of my need for connection/ acceptance/ inclusion not being met ...

James Prieto said...

Thanks Tam for your comment, and for being willing to talk about how scary it can be to give honesty, especially when you are thinking that it comes at the expense of connection and acceptance. I often feel anxious and afraid around giving honesty for the same reasons. I am coming to value how important it is to create "safety" in a group, such that judgment is somehow contained or curtailed (by calling out the "jackals"), so that participants get their needs for acceptance and trust met.